The End of Competitive Advantage

Original
Strategy is stuck. For too long the business world has been obsessed with the notion of building a sustainable competitive advantage. That idea is at the core of most strategy textbooks; it forms the basis of Warren Buffetts investment strategy; its central to the success of companies on the most admired lists. Im not arguing that its a bad ideaobviously, its marvelous to compete in a way that others cant imitate. And even today there are companies that create a strong position and defend it for extended periods of timefirms such as GE, IKEA, Unilever, Tsingtao Brewery, and Swiss Re. But its now rare for a company to maintain a truly lasting advantage. Competitors and customers have become too unpredictable, and industries too amorphous. The forces at work here are familiar: the digital revolution, a flat world, fewer barriers to entry, globalization.
Strategy is still useful in turbulent industries like consumer electronics, fast-moving consumer goods, television, publishing, photography, andwell, you get the idea. Leaders in these businesses can compete effectivelybut not by sticking to the same old playbook. In a world where a competitive advantage often evaporates in less than a year, companies cant afford to spend months at a time crafting a single long-term strategy. To stay ahead, they need to constantly start new strategic initiatives, building and exploiting many transient competitive advantages at once.

Sign in or create a free account to access the full essay