What libertarianism has become and will become — State Capacity Libertarianism
Summary
Cowen argues that the traditional libertarian movement has lost energy and that its smartest members have drifted toward a different stance. He names it State Capacity Libertarianism and lays out its core beliefs in a numbered list: markets deserve credit, but a strong, competent state is needed to support them. He then contrasts this position with liberaltarianism.
Key points
- Cowen believes old-style libertarianism has stalled and cannot address problems such as climate change.
- Markets and capitalism are powerful, but strong states are needed to build and protect them.
- A strong state is different from a large or tyrannical one.
- Many American failures, from infrastructure to education, reflect weak state capacity, not only overregulation.
- This view is friendlier to infrastructure, science funding, nuclear power, and space programs.
- Internet debate has shaped which ideas survive and how the doctrine evolved.
Why practice this
Cowen writes in a compressed blog style with numbered propositions, blunt asides, and quick qualifications. Retyping him teaches economical argument, careful hedging, and how to define a new term by stating what it is and what it is not.
Practice an excerpt
These excerpts are short quotations for practice and commentary. All rights stay with the author; read the whole essay at the original source.
0%
About this essay
Cowen proposes State Capacity Libertarianism, a pro-market philosophy that also values an effective, capable government.
“What libertarianism has become and will become — State Capacity Libertarianism” was written by Tyler Cowen. Read the original at marginalrevolution.com. Copywork shows a summary and short excerpts for practice and commentary; all rights stay with the author.